Should I defend myself?

A Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack.” – Yoda, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back

I thought I’d start this blog off with a quote from an actual conversation that took place between myself and a guy in a pub one evening:

You’re a Christian right?
Didn’t Jesus say to turn the other cheek?
He did yeah
So if I slap you, you have to let me slap the other one right?
That’s right, but there’s a slight flaw in your reasoning.
What’s that?
You’re assuming you can hit the first one, and Jesus says nothing about me having to let you do that.

Admittedly, whilst we weren’t drunk, we weren’t going to be passing a police breathalyzer test that night. Fortunately, he didn’t decide to try and hit me, and we just carried on with our game of darts.

As many of you may know, I study martial arts and the subject of self defense comes up occasionally, especially in the context of  “turn the other cheek”. It also comes up regarding the respectful act of bowing to instructors, and in some of the more eastern philosophy and concepts. But that’s for another time.

Just what exactly can we do when it comes to defending ourselves?

In one of my first lessons, the instructor said “If you’re in a situation and you can run, run. If you can’t run, try and talk your way out of it. If you can’t do either of those things, only then use what we teach and only enough to get away”.  This has stuck with me ever since; it certainly helped that the instructor was very strict on respecting the style and not using our skills to show off. I’ve never really understood what being able to beat someone up actually proves, which is probably why I try to avoid a fight whenever possible.

It’s been a good set of rules to go with, it seemed to work for Jesus. Pretty much anytime he was under threat of physical abuse he’d leave the town. The only time he couldn’t was when the Roman authorities came to arrest him but I’ll come back to this. So what would constitute “doing enough to get away”, assuming that you couldn’t simply run or talk your way out of it?  I wouldn’t suddenly start brandishing a sword; if a punch comes towards me, a simple dodge and/or block would be sufficient whilst trying to get out of the situation. If getting out of the situation involved having to hit someone, then I’ll hit them. It’s not something I would enjoy or be proud of, and it’s not something I would do first, but Jesus did send the disciples out with swords (Luke 22:35-38), and some commentaries have suggested that in addition to these being for hunting animals and chopping wood, they would have had them for self defense. Now, I’m not saying that this is a mandate for Christians to carry weapons, but it seems Jesus was happy for them to defend themselves if they needed to.

So what do we do when it comes to defending other people? For me, this should be a no-brainer. If you see someone getting beat up, you step in.  I’m not suggesting we all become Batman here, that we go out and find situations to swoop in and help people and beat the bad guys up, but I don’t think Jesus would expect us or command us to simply walk by either. Parable of the Good Samaritan anyone?

Again, diving in with fists first doesn’t need to be the first reaction. Peter pulled out a sword and went for the Roman soldiers before they even did anything, and Jesus wasn’t particularly happy about it. This very much seems to be at odds with the above about Jesus allowing swords for defense, but it seems that context is everything. Yes, Peter went to defend Jesus, but he went on the attack with the intent to harm whilst doing it. I am not suggesting that you harm anyone, but in the course of defending yourself, harming the other person may be unavoidable.

Looking through the Gospels, it seems that Jesus was never faced with a situation that he had no way out of, he was always able to walk away before anything happened. The only exception that I can find was when the Roman soldiers came to arrest him. Being honest, if the authorities came to arrest me, I wouldn’t be putting up much of a struggle. Am I being pedantic? Probably, but I don’t think it’s an irrelevant point. Like anything, it all comes down to context, and the number of scenario’s that people can come up with seem endless. I can’t address every single one, nor do I think what I’ve written above can be universally applied to all of them. Jesus was certainly an advocate for avoiding violence and finding other solutions, (which would be putting it mildly), though he was not above using a whip when the situation called for it. (John 2:15)

When we think about non-violence, it seems to be so simple on the face surface; don’t be violent. Is blocking someone’s attack violent though? Is using a punch to dissuade/distract your attacker so it allows you time to escape, violent? How many punches can your opponent throw before it becomes acceptable to respond? It’s at this point that the discussion on this can get bogged down with semantics and word play, and this blog is most likely an example of that.

The section of my conversation with a stranger at the beginning of this blog is probably a classic example. I think I was correct in what I said, but I wasn’t looking for a fight. Many people seem to think that Christians are supposed to stand idly and let others simply hit and abuse them, which is another reason the subject of self defense comes up. Many people say a violent response simply perpetuates the cycle of violence and they’re right, but I’ve not said to be violent, I’ve only ever said do what you need to do to protect yourself and get out of the situation (there’s that word play). I’m sure there are those who will disagree, who believe that Christians shouldn’t be even studying martial arts (despite the fitness and discipline it instills). It’s very easy to debate the ins and outs from the sidelines, it’s a little different when you’re facing someone intent on hurting you.

The answer to the question in the title should have been a short sharp yes. Given that this is now my 17th draft, it seems it’s really not as simple as that, or maybe it is, but the discussions around context gets complicated. In a perfect world, we wouldn’t be attacking each other so there would be no need to defend ourselves; but unfortunately, we don’t live in that kind of world…yet.


4 thoughts on “Should I defend myself?

  1. 3boxesofbs says:

    I think many people misunderstand the “Turn the Other Cheek” parable because we can not relate to such a different culture. At the time it was socially acceptable – and even legal — for a ‘socially superior person’ to slap a person below him in status.
    The parable contains information that has to be in context.. Slap implies the use of the right hand — because the left was unclean. By turning the other cheek, the person would have to backhand you to do it again. That contact implies the same social status.

    So Jesus was saying if someone insults you, show them you consider yourself their equal.

    Regarding Peter defending Jesus at the Garden; I think it has less to do with the violence and more with the nature of God’s plan. Jesus could have been an earthly ruler, could have lead a rebellion but that wasn’t His mission. He came to die on the cross; nothing could interfere with that plan.
    Remember that God is unchanging — the same God who killed so willingly in the Old Testament is still the one who is coming back. Read Revelations. Jesus came to correct the misunderstanding humans had made of God’s will. That is why he so often said “you have heard” to distinguish from what God had written.

    Bob S.

    • Thank you for you comment Bob

      That last part is always interesting. In Matthew 5, Jesus says “you have heard it said…..” not “it is written” which is curious since the NIV (For example) references Exodus 21:24, Lev. 24:20 and Deut. 19:21 at this point. Yet Jesus doesn’t seem to be referring to scripture when he says this…..just one of the many oddities.

      • 3boxesofbs says:

        I think Jesus, according to the research I’ve done, was talking about the oral traditions and interpretations handed down.

        These supposedly ‘expanded on’ and ‘explained’ what was meant by the verse scriptures. A great example of this is the “eye for an eye” which as written was a legal limit on the punishments the courts imposed. The Pharisees had twisted it into what an individual should do to someone who wronged them.

        Bob S.

  2. […] So we seem to have the wrong target, what about the tactics? Well, Jesus was not slow to go on the attack against the Pharisees regarding their attitude towards those who they deemed to be unworthy (a theme to which I will return), but he was also equally as quick to show love to people. His attack was against the ways of the devil the Pharisees adopted that resulted in people being hurt was love and healing. But people see attacking as that, an attack to hurt and defeat an opponent and the vicar used actual war examples where that was the aim to show “this works and is good and what we should do”. Peter showed though that when you adopt that strategy as an attack, people get very hurt. Jesus not only rebuked him for it though, he healed the soldier to repair the damage, (Matthew 26:51-52). Jesus used his ‘attacks’ to defend others, Peter used his ‘attacks’ to harm others and this distinction has got very lost and was missing from these sermons. It seems to be a very important distinction because passages like Ephesians get used to support Christians owning (and using) guns and authors like Ben Corey and Derek Flood do an excellent job in showing this distinction; Flood has written an entire book dedicated to this subject. I put some of my views in “Should I defend myself” […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s